From b17a8a00a2aaec71bb67325c2ed6a22d1ff8ebcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: djm Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 04:29:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] spell out that custom options/extensions should follow the usual SSH naming rules, e.g. "extension@example.com" --- usr.bin/ssh/PROTOCOL.certkeys | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/usr.bin/ssh/PROTOCOL.certkeys b/usr.bin/ssh/PROTOCOL.certkeys index 734b606bb95..42aa8c2a173 100644 --- a/usr.bin/ssh/PROTOCOL.certkeys +++ b/usr.bin/ssh/PROTOCOL.certkeys @@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ option-specific information (see below). All options are "critical", if an implementation does not recognise a option then the validating party should refuse to accept the certificate. +Custom options should append the originating author or organisation's +domain name to the option name, e.g. "my-option@example.com". + No critical options are defined for host certificates at present. The supported user certificate options and the contents and structure of their data fields are: @@ -255,6 +258,9 @@ as is the requirement that each name appear only once. If an implementation does not recognise an extension, then it should ignore it. +Custom options should append the originating author or organisation's +domain name to the option name, e.g. "my-option@example.com". + No extensions are defined for host certificates at present. The supported user certificate extensions and the contents and structure of their data fields are: @@ -285,4 +291,4 @@ permit-user-rc empty Flag indicating that execution of of this script will not be permitted if this option is not present. -$OpenBSD: PROTOCOL.certkeys,v 1.11 2017/05/16 16:54:05 djm Exp $ +$OpenBSD: PROTOCOL.certkeys,v 1.12 2017/05/31 04:29:44 djm Exp $ -- 2.20.1