From 65903de8a058aba86ce1403997c05c92629ef2e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: thib <thib@openbsd.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:30:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Remove an XXX comment about using the same pool for mfs and
 ffs, since mfs is using the ffs code and its the same object it would make no
 sense having two seperate pools...

ok art@
---
 sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
index dd315612dae..2837b4a7e15 100644
--- a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
+++ b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.113 2008/03/16 19:42:57 otto Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.114 2008/07/09 09:30:51 thib Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.19 1996/02/09 22:22:26 christos Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ retry:
 #ifdef VFSDEBUG
 	vp->v_flag |= VLOCKSWORK;
 #endif
-	/* XXX - we use the same pool for ffs and mfs */
 	ip = pool_get(&ffs_ino_pool, PR_WAITOK);
 	bzero((caddr_t)ip, sizeof(struct inode));
 	lockinit(&ip->i_lock, PINOD, "inode", 0, 0);
-- 
2.20.1