From: jsg Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 10:22:20 +0000 (+0000) Subject: drm/i915: Fix premature release of request's reusable memory X-Git-Url: http://artulab.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fa60bc73480414f80d242084790e48926dc13d4d;p=openbsd drm/i915: Fix premature release of request's reusable memory From Janusz Krzysztofik 4db8b39418a685179263b7ad895a3182d72be358 in linux-6.1.y/6.1.45 a337b64f0d5717248a0c894e2618e658e6a9de9f in mainline linux --- diff --git a/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_active.c index de21524f9d1..96e3e84d376 100644 --- a/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_active.c +++ b/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_active.c @@ -461,8 +461,11 @@ int i915_active_add_request(struct i915_active *ref, struct i915_request *rq) } } while (unlikely(is_barrier(active))); - if (!__i915_active_fence_set(active, fence)) + fence = __i915_active_fence_set(active, fence); + if (!fence) __i915_active_acquire(ref); + else + dma_fence_put(fence); out: i915_active_release(ref); @@ -481,13 +484,9 @@ __i915_active_set_fence(struct i915_active *ref, return NULL; } - rcu_read_lock(); prev = __i915_active_fence_set(active, fence); - if (prev) - prev = dma_fence_get_rcu(prev); - else + if (!prev) __i915_active_acquire(ref); - rcu_read_unlock(); return prev; } @@ -1043,10 +1042,11 @@ void i915_request_add_active_barriers(struct i915_request *rq) * * Records the new @fence as the last active fence along its timeline in * this active tracker, moving the tracking callbacks from the previous - * fence onto this one. Returns the previous fence (if not already completed), - * which the caller must ensure is executed before the new fence. To ensure - * that the order of fences within the timeline of the i915_active_fence is - * understood, it should be locked by the caller. + * fence onto this one. Gets and returns a reference to the previous fence + * (if not already completed), which the caller must put after making sure + * that it is executed before the new fence. To ensure that the order of + * fences within the timeline of the i915_active_fence is understood, it + * should be locked by the caller. */ struct dma_fence * __i915_active_fence_set(struct i915_active_fence *active, @@ -1055,7 +1055,23 @@ __i915_active_fence_set(struct i915_active_fence *active, struct dma_fence *prev; unsigned long flags; - if (fence == rcu_access_pointer(active->fence)) + /* + * In case of fences embedded in i915_requests, their memory is + * SLAB_FAILSAFE_BY_RCU, then it can be reused right after release + * by new requests. Then, there is a risk of passing back a pointer + * to a new, completely unrelated fence that reuses the same memory + * while tracked under a different active tracker. Combined with i915 + * perf open/close operations that build await dependencies between + * engine kernel context requests and user requests from different + * timelines, this can lead to dependency loops and infinite waits. + * + * As a countermeasure, we try to get a reference to the active->fence + * first, so if we succeed and pass it back to our user then it is not + * released and potentially reused by an unrelated request before the + * user has a chance to set up an await dependency on it. + */ + prev = i915_active_fence_get(active); + if (fence == prev) return fence; GEM_BUG_ON(test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags)); @@ -1064,27 +1080,56 @@ __i915_active_fence_set(struct i915_active_fence *active, * Consider that we have two threads arriving (A and B), with * C already resident as the active->fence. * - * A does the xchg first, and so it sees C or NULL depending - * on the timing of the interrupt handler. If it is NULL, the - * previous fence must have been signaled and we know that - * we are first on the timeline. If it is still present, - * we acquire the lock on that fence and serialise with the interrupt - * handler, in the process removing it from any future interrupt - * callback. A will then wait on C before executing (if present). - * - * As B is second, it sees A as the previous fence and so waits for - * it to complete its transition and takes over the occupancy for - * itself -- remembering that it needs to wait on A before executing. + * Both A and B have got a reference to C or NULL, depending on the + * timing of the interrupt handler. Let's assume that if A has got C + * then it has locked C first (before B). * * Note the strong ordering of the timeline also provides consistent * nesting rules for the fence->lock; the inner lock is always the * older lock. */ spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags); - prev = xchg(__active_fence_slot(active), fence); - if (prev) { - GEM_BUG_ON(prev == fence); + if (prev) spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + + /* + * A does the cmpxchg first, and so it sees C or NULL, as before, or + * something else, depending on the timing of other threads and/or + * interrupt handler. If not the same as before then A unlocks C if + * applicable and retries, starting from an attempt to get a new + * active->fence. Meanwhile, B follows the same path as A. + * Once A succeeds with cmpxch, B fails again, retires, gets A from + * active->fence, locks it as soon as A completes, and possibly + * succeeds with cmpxchg. + */ + while (cmpxchg(__active_fence_slot(active), prev, fence) != prev) { + if (prev) { + spin_unlock(prev->lock); + dma_fence_put(prev); + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags); + + prev = i915_active_fence_get(active); + GEM_BUG_ON(prev == fence); + + spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags); + if (prev) + spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + } + + /* + * If prev is NULL then the previous fence must have been signaled + * and we know that we are first on the timeline. If it is still + * present then, having the lock on that fence already acquired, we + * serialise with the interrupt handler, in the process of removing it + * from any future interrupt callback. A will then wait on C before + * executing (if present). + * + * As B is second, it sees A as the previous fence and so waits for + * it to complete its transition and takes over the occupancy for + * itself -- remembering that it needs to wait on A before executing. + */ + if (prev) { __list_del_entry(&active->cb.node); spin_unlock(prev->lock); /* serialise with prev->cb_list */ } @@ -1101,11 +1146,7 @@ int i915_active_fence_set(struct i915_active_fence *active, int err = 0; /* Must maintain timeline ordering wrt previous active requests */ - rcu_read_lock(); fence = __i915_active_fence_set(active, &rq->fence); - if (fence) /* but the previous fence may not belong to that timeline! */ - fence = dma_fence_get_rcu(fence); - rcu_read_unlock(); if (fence) { err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(rq, fence); dma_fence_put(fence); diff --git a/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_request.c index d0728df7261..1e37187e84e 100644 --- a/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/sys/dev/pci/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -1728,6 +1728,11 @@ __i915_request_ensure_parallel_ordering(struct i915_request *rq, request_to_parent(rq)->parallel.last_rq = i915_request_get(rq); + /* + * Users have to put a reference potentially got by + * __i915_active_fence_set() to the returned request + * when no longer needed + */ return to_request(__i915_active_fence_set(&timeline->last_request, &rq->fence)); } @@ -1774,6 +1779,10 @@ __i915_request_ensure_ordering(struct i915_request *rq, 0); } + /* + * Users have to put the reference to prev potentially got + * by __i915_active_fence_set() when no longer needed + */ return prev; } @@ -1817,6 +1826,8 @@ __i915_request_add_to_timeline(struct i915_request *rq) prev = __i915_request_ensure_ordering(rq, timeline); else prev = __i915_request_ensure_parallel_ordering(rq, timeline); + if (prev) + i915_request_put(prev); /* * Make sure that no request gazumped us - if it was allocated after