From: guenther Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:36:10 +0000 (+0000) Subject: __MAP_NOFAULT doesn't make sense with anon mappings, so return EINVAL if X-Git-Url: http://artulab.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=769346273878ee87025928ee34bbba76f217f4be;p=openbsd __MAP_NOFAULT doesn't make sense with anon mappings, so return EINVAL if that is attempted. Minor cleanups: - Eliminate some always false and always true tests against MAP_ANON - We treat anon mappings with neither MAP_{SHARED,PRIVATE} as MAP_PRIVATE so explicitly indicate that ok kettenis@ beck@ --- diff --git a/sys/uvm/uvm_map.c b/sys/uvm/uvm_map.c index ddab1cb5405..1fb3f00e241 100644 --- a/sys/uvm/uvm_map.c +++ b/sys/uvm/uvm_map.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $OpenBSD: uvm_map.c,v 1.232 2017/08/12 16:30:10 guenther Exp $ */ +/* $OpenBSD: uvm_map.c,v 1.233 2017/11/30 00:36:10 guenther Exp $ */ /* $NetBSD: uvm_map.c,v 1.86 2000/11/27 08:40:03 chs Exp $ */ /* @@ -1064,8 +1064,6 @@ uvm_mapanon(struct vm_map *map, vaddr_t *addr, vsize_t sz, entry->inheritance = inherit; entry->wired_count = 0; entry->advice = advice; - if (flags & UVM_FLAG_NOFAULT) - entry->etype |= UVM_ET_NOFAULT; if (flags & UVM_FLAG_COPYONW) { entry->etype |= UVM_ET_COPYONWRITE; if ((flags & UVM_FLAG_OVERLAY) == 0) diff --git a/sys/uvm/uvm_mmap.c b/sys/uvm/uvm_mmap.c index 16c98a87f01..fce6632942d 100644 --- a/sys/uvm/uvm_mmap.c +++ b/sys/uvm/uvm_mmap.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $OpenBSD: uvm_mmap.c,v 1.142 2017/01/21 05:42:03 guenther Exp $ */ +/* $OpenBSD: uvm_mmap.c,v 1.143 2017/11/30 00:36:10 guenther Exp $ */ /* $NetBSD: uvm_mmap.c,v 1.49 2001/02/18 21:19:08 chs Exp $ */ /* @@ -459,8 +459,6 @@ sys_mmap(struct proc *p, void *v, register_t *retval) /* * Old programs may not select a specific sharing type, so * default to an appropriate one. - * - * XXX: how does MAP_ANON fit in the picture? */ if ((flags & (MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE)) == 0) { #if defined(DEBUG) @@ -521,7 +519,7 @@ sys_mmap(struct proc *p, void *v, register_t *retval) /* MAP_PRIVATE mappings can always write to */ maxprot |= PROT_WRITE; } - if ((flags & MAP_ANON) != 0 || (flags & __MAP_NOFAULT) != 0 || + if ((flags & __MAP_NOFAULT) != 0 || ((flags & MAP_PRIVATE) != 0 && (prot & PROT_WRITE) != 0)) { if (p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_DATA].rlim_cur < size || p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_DATA].rlim_cur - size < @@ -533,25 +531,31 @@ sys_mmap(struct proc *p, void *v, register_t *retval) error = uvm_mmapfile(&p->p_vmspace->vm_map, &addr, size, prot, maxprot, flags, vp, pos, p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur, p); } else { /* MAP_ANON case */ - /* - * XXX What do we do about (MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE) == 0? - */ if (fd != -1) return EINVAL; is_anon: /* label for SunOS style /dev/zero */ - if ((flags & MAP_ANON) != 0 || (flags & __MAP_NOFAULT) != 0 || - ((flags & MAP_PRIVATE) != 0 && (prot & PROT_WRITE) != 0)) { - if (p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_DATA].rlim_cur < size || - p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_DATA].rlim_cur - size < - ptoa(p->p_vmspace->vm_dused)) { - return ENOMEM; - } + /* __MAP_NOFAULT only makes sense with a backing object */ + if ((flags & __MAP_NOFAULT) != 0) + return EINVAL; + + if (p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_DATA].rlim_cur < size || + p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_DATA].rlim_cur - size < + ptoa(p->p_vmspace->vm_dused)) { + return ENOMEM; } + + /* + * We've been treating (MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE) == 0 as + * MAP_PRIVATE, so make that clear. + */ + if ((flags & MAP_SHARED) == 0) + flags |= MAP_PRIVATE; + maxprot = PROT_MASK; - error = uvm_mmapanon(&p->p_vmspace->vm_map, &addr, size, prot, maxprot, - flags, p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur, p); + error = uvm_mmapanon(&p->p_vmspace->vm_map, &addr, size, prot, + maxprot, flags, p->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur, p); } if (error == 0)