From: thib <thib@openbsd.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:30:51 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Remove an XXX comment about using the same pool for mfs and ffs, since
X-Git-Url: http://artulab.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=65903de8a058aba86ce1403997c05c92629ef2e7;p=openbsd

Remove an XXX comment about using the same pool for mfs and ffs, since
mfs is using the ffs code and its the same object it would make no sense
having two seperate pools...

ok art@
---

diff --git a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
index dd315612dae..2837b4a7e15 100644
--- a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
+++ b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*	$OpenBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.113 2008/03/16 19:42:57 otto Exp $	*/
+/*	$OpenBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.114 2008/07/09 09:30:51 thib Exp $	*/
 /*	$NetBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.19 1996/02/09 22:22:26 christos Exp $	*/
 
 /*
@@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ retry:
 #ifdef VFSDEBUG
 	vp->v_flag |= VLOCKSWORK;
 #endif
-	/* XXX - we use the same pool for ffs and mfs */
 	ip = pool_get(&ffs_ino_pool, PR_WAITOK);
 	bzero((caddr_t)ip, sizeof(struct inode));
 	lockinit(&ip->i_lock, PINOD, "inode", 0, 0);