From: tb <tb@openbsd.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:05:50 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Curious to see if explicitly ignoring the return value appeases Coverity
X-Git-Url: http://artulab.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4ee61787c81c9528bbb35ce669563a9280e3c97a;p=openbsd

Curious to see if explicitly ignoring the return value appeases Coverity
---

diff --git a/lib/libcrypto/cmac/cmac.c b/lib/libcrypto/cmac/cmac.c
index 42f630c1499..86b1b2d5bee 100644
--- a/lib/libcrypto/cmac/cmac.c
+++ b/lib/libcrypto/cmac/cmac.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: cmac.c,v 1.20 2024/01/28 20:57:15 tb Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: cmac.c,v 1.21 2024/01/29 06:05:50 tb Exp $ */
 /* Written by Dr Stephen N Henson (steve@openssl.org) for the OpenSSL
  * project.
  */
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ void
 CMAC_CTX_cleanup(CMAC_CTX *ctx)
 {
 	if (ctx->cipher_ctx != NULL)
-		EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset(ctx->cipher_ctx);
+		(void)EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset(ctx->cipher_ctx);
 	explicit_bzero(ctx->tbl, EVP_MAX_BLOCK_LENGTH);
 	explicit_bzero(ctx->k1, EVP_MAX_BLOCK_LENGTH);
 	explicit_bzero(ctx->k2, EVP_MAX_BLOCK_LENGTH);