-/* $OpenBSD: route.c,v 1.368 2017/11/29 19:15:48 claudio Exp $ */
+/* $OpenBSD: route.c,v 1.369 2018/01/02 12:57:30 mpi Exp $ */
/* $NetBSD: route.c,v 1.14 1996/02/13 22:00:46 christos Exp $ */
/*
void rtflushclone(unsigned int, struct rtentry *);
int rt_ifa_purge_walker(struct rtentry *, void *, unsigned int);
struct rtentry *rt_match(struct sockaddr *, uint32_t *, int, unsigned int);
+struct rtentry *rt_clone(struct rtentry *, struct sockaddr *, unsigned int);
struct sockaddr *rt_plentosa(sa_family_t, int, struct sockaddr_in6 *);
#ifdef DDB
struct rtentry *
rt_match(struct sockaddr *dst, uint32_t *src, int flags, unsigned int tableid)
{
- struct rtentry *rt0, *rt = NULL;
- int error = 0;
-
- NET_ASSERT_LOCKED();
+ struct rtentry *rt = NULL;
rt = rtable_match(tableid, dst, src);
- if (rt != NULL) {
- if ((rt->rt_flags & RTF_CLONING) && ISSET(flags, RT_RESOLVE)) {
- struct rt_addrinfo info;
+ if (rt == NULL) {
+ rtstat_inc(rts_unreach);
+ return (NULL);
+ }
- rt0 = rt;
+ if (ISSET(rt->rt_flags, RTF_CLONING) && ISSET(flags, RT_RESOLVE))
+ rt = rt_clone(rt, dst, tableid);
- memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
- info.rti_info[RTAX_DST] = dst;
+ rt->rt_use++;
+ return (rt);
+}
- KERNEL_LOCK();
- /*
- * The priority of cloned route should be different
- * to avoid conflict with /32 cloning routes.
- *
- * It should also be higher to let the ARP layer find
- * cloned routes instead of the cloning one.
- */
- error = rtrequest(RTM_RESOLVE, &info,
- rt->rt_priority - 1, &rt, tableid);
- if (error) {
- rtm_miss(RTM_MISS, &info, 0, RTP_NONE, 0,
- error, tableid);
- } else {
- /* Inform listeners of the new route */
- rtm_send(rt, RTM_ADD, 0, tableid);
- rtfree(rt0);
- }
- KERNEL_UNLOCK();
- }
- rt->rt_use++;
- } else
- rtstat_inc(rts_unreach);
+struct rtentry *
+rt_clone(struct rtentry *rt, struct sockaddr *dst, unsigned int rtableid)
+{
+ struct rt_addrinfo info;
+ struct rtentry *rt0;
+ int error = 0;
+
+ rt0 = rt;
+
+ memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+ info.rti_info[RTAX_DST] = dst;
+
+ KERNEL_LOCK();
+ /*
+ * The priority of cloned route should be different
+ * to avoid conflict with /32 cloning routes.
+ *
+ * It should also be higher to let the ARP layer find
+ * cloned routes instead of the cloning one.
+ */
+ error = rtrequest(RTM_RESOLVE, &info, rt->rt_priority - 1, &rt,
+ rtableid);
+ if (error) {
+ rtm_miss(RTM_MISS, &info, 0, RTP_NONE, 0, error, rtableid);
+ } else {
+ /* Inform listeners of the new route */
+ rtm_send(rt, RTM_ADD, 0, rtableid);
+ rtfree(rt0);
+ }
+ KERNEL_UNLOCK();
return (rt);
}