Remove an XXX comment about using the same pool for mfs and ffs, since

mfs is using the ffs code and its the same object it would make no sense
having two seperate pools...

ok art@

diff --git a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
index dd31561..2837b4a 100644 (file)
--- a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
+++ b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*     $OpenBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.113 2008/03/16 19:42:57 otto Exp $   */
+/*     $OpenBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.114 2008/07/09 09:30:51 thib Exp $   */
 /*     $NetBSD: ffs_vfsops.c,v 1.19 1996/02/09 22:22:26 christos Exp $ */
 
 /*
@@ -1253,7 +1253,6 @@ retry:
 #ifdef VFSDEBUG
        vp->v_flag |= VLOCKSWORK;
 #endif
-       /* XXX - we use the same pool for ffs and mfs */
        ip = pool_get(&ffs_ino_pool, PR_WAITOK);
        bzero((caddr_t)ip, sizeof(struct inode));
        lockinit(&ip->i_lock, PINOD, "inode", 0, 0);